top of page
  • Action for Economic Reforms

SULU: WHY NOW?

Mr. Buencamino does political commentary for Action for Economic Reforms. This article was published in the Yellow Pad column of BusinessWorld, March 14, 2005 edition, p. 21.


The military sees no strategic reason for the attacks in Sulu. They

claim the latest outbreak of violence is simply in retaliation for the

death of innocents in a skirmish between soldiers and rebels. However,

the sequence of events following those bloody encounters seems to

indicate that there is more to this current disturbance than meets the

eye.


The rebel attack on a battalion headquarters makes one wonder whether

the attack was truly spontaneous. It’s no cakewalk to attack a

battalion headquarters, nor is it easy to hit a bull’s-eye with a

mortar shell fired from a considerable distance.


The coordinated terror bombings that followed the government

counter-attack smacks of considerable pre-planning too. The rebel press

release following the Valentine’s Day bombings shows it was not written

on the run, it was well-crafted and well-thought out.


Was the arrival of at least two dozen Jemaiyah Islamiyah terrorists in

Mindanao last January completely unrelated to Sulu and the Valentine’s

Day bombings? Isn’t it plausible that there is a strategic reason for

the timing of the attacks by the MNLF /ASG group? Consider the

following.


Malaysia is currently deporting thousands of Filipinos from Sabah.

These deportees are presumed to be Filipinos on the say-so of Sabah

authorities. It makes no sense. How do two governments determine the

true nationality of hundreds of thousands of undocumented people who

look exactly like all the other inhabitants of the island? Sabah is an

island full of undocumented indigenous tribesmen, Indonesians and

Filipinos. They all speak Bahasa. Who is what?


The truth of the matter is these “illegals” are, for all intents and

purposes, Sabahans. Accepting some of them as Filipinos without any

real procedure or system to verify nationality is simply allowing

Malaysia to create more problems for us while helping them keep the

“Filipino” population in Sabah to manageable levels.


The government’s resources will be strained by the influx of deportees.

Where will the government find jobs and livelihood for these people?

The government has nothing for them. That’s why Mrs. Arroyo was

desperately begging Malaysia for a quick turn-around of deportees for

re-employment in Sabah.


Unfortunately, the majority of deportees will remain in the Philippines

because only those who can find employers or those whose employers want

them back can re-enter Sabah. The government will have to take care of

the rest. If government fails, the result will be discontent and

desperation – the active ingredients for new rebel recruitment to the

alleged dwindling ranks of rebels from Sulu.

{mospagebreak}


The situation in Sulu will force the government to spend money it does

not have to finance a war, monitor and neutralize probable terrorist

threats, and care for refugees from conflict areas while dealing with

the problem of absorbing thousands of deportees Where will the

government get the money for all these simultaneous expenses?


The government will have no choice but to run to Uncle Sam for

assistance-for arms and ammunition, and for the civilian costs related

to refugees, war damages and reparations. American involvement will

intensify and that will play right into the hands of those who want to

internationalize the conflict.


More American involvement is not exactly the kind of thing that Muslim

countries who have been trying to broker peace in the south want to

see. They will not sit on their hands while a Protestant government

provides Catholics with arms, ammunition and intelligence data to use

against their brother Muslims. If the Sulu conflict escalates and

Muslims suffer, these countries will, without a doubt, find a way to

send whatever assistance is necessary for the self-defense of their

brother Muslims. There are other consequences of the

internationa-lization of the Sulu war.


First, the moribund Nur Misuari has been resuscitated. There are calls

to release him from custody and exile him to Saudi Arabia. Nur Misuari

is no ordinary insurgent. He may not have made the transition from

outlaw to governor but as a rebel leader he is without peer. If he is

exiled to Saudi Arabia, he will regain OIC observer status for his

faction of the MNLF. The MNLF faction cooperating with the government

and sitting as observers to the OIC are clowns compared to Nur.


Second, the Philippine application for observer status to the

Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC) will be jeopardized because the

transfer of observer status from the MNLF to the Philippine government

depends on the peaceful relationship between Manila and Muslims. The

Philippines is in a situation like Russia whose application for

observer status was also held in abeyance because of Moscow’s Chechen

problem.


Third, if the war in Sulu continues indefinitely, the MILF will have to

side with the Sulu rebels. There is no way for the MILF to maintain

control over their more radical members and to keep “respectability”

with JI and Al Qaeda, from whom it presumably gets some support for

providing training camps within territories it controls, if it remains

neutral in a war waged by an American backed government against

Muslims.


The attacks leave the government in a bind. It cannot call for a

ceasefire without appearing weak and it cannot wage a never-ending all

out war because it is in dire financial straits.


The Sulu attack couldn’t have come at a better time or produced a

better outcome for the MNLF/ASG group-the government’s resources will

be strained, an essentially local conflict will become

internatio-nalized, Nur Misuari is a player again and the MILF will

have to take sides or lose credibility among Muslims.


How’s that for a spontaneous retaliation to an accidental killing?

Comments


bottom of page