top of page
  • Action for Economic Reforms

GENDER LESSONS FROM THE MOSUO PEOPLE OF CHINA

Malapit is the Research Associate and Policy Analyst of Action for

Economic Reforms. This piece was published in the Yellow Pad column of

Business World, 16 August 2004 Edition.


A recent story on the Discovery Channel show “Hour Asia” featured an

unusual indigenous tribe of the Yunnan province of China, the Mosuo

people. Two things make this tribe particularly interesting: First, in

this tribe women do all the work – including physical labor. Men do

little or nothing all day. Second, there are no marriages in this

tribe. Consequently, they have no concept of ‘husband’ or ‘father’.


A Chinese oddity


The Lugu Lake is home to the Mosuo people, one of China’s 56 ethnic

groups. Hidden from the rest of China behind the Xiaoliang mountains,

the Mosuo culture has evolved with little influence from its neighbors.

Unlike the rest of China, where the one-child policy created nuclear

families and a clear preference for male children, the Mosuo people

live in extended families and prefer female children.


The most publicized aspect of the Mosuo culture however, is their

sexual freedom – men and women can have as many lovers as they wish

without legal restraints. Recently, Lugu Lake has become a popular

tourist spot, particularly for men enticed by the fantasy of “free

love”.


The “walking marriage”


The institution of marriage as we know it does not exist in the Mosuo

culture. Instead, they practice “walking marriages”, where the man

would visit the woman at night, and go home to his mother’s house in

the morning. They can begin or end their relationship at any time, and

are allowed as many lovers as they wish. There is no formality in these

relationships and lovers never share common property, as all property

is inherited by women. Children borne from such unions are raised by

the mother’s family, and live their entire lives in their mother’s

home. There are no social or economic responsibilities expected from

the father.


The Mosuo people find little reason to mix matters of survival and

matters of the heart. For them, control over matters of property and

the raising of children should remain in the hands of blood relatives,

whose loyalty to the family is unquestionable. Thus, relationships are

pursued out of love, without issues of money or property to complicate

it. Contented couples stay together, and unhappy couples can go their

separate ways. The absence of paternal relations has done away with

domestic conflicts with in-laws, a common source of conflict in our

society.


Women rule


Mosuo families are organized in maternal clans, with several

generations living under one roof. The extended family is led by the

matriarch, and leadership of the household is passed on to the most

intelligent daughter.


The matriarch makes all the economic decisions, dividing the work and

the income of the household among its members. The curious thing about

the division of labor, however, is that women do almost all the work,

both productive (farming/fishing) and domestic work. Men work only

twice a year, during extreme labor shortages.


What is the quality of life of the Mosuo men?


For many men in our society, a “walking marriage” is perhaps a dream

come true. One anonymous male posted a message in the internet saying

that all his friends want to join the Mosuo tribe when they found out

that men can have multiple lovers with no social or economic

responsibilities. But are Mosuo men really better off?


Following standard consumption theory, the Mosuo men must have very

high levels of satisfaction or utility considering the amount of

leisure they enjoy. On the other hand, if we define well-being in terms

of human functioning, as in Amartya Sen’s definition of the ability “to

do” and “to be”, one might conclude that Mosuo men are clearly at a

disadvantage, since they have little control over their lives.


Gender biases reflect power structures


Feminist economists have argued that the gender bias we observe in our

societies today reflects the power structure between men and women.

Perhaps the arguments put forward by feminist economists are better

appreciated when the tables are turned. In the Mosuo tribe, it is

obvious that because women have control over resources, they can decide

who gets what and enjoy a much higher social status than men.


In fact, because there is little conflict and therefore little

bargaining in Mosuo households, it exemplifies Gary Becker’s

‘altruistic’ family model. In Becker’s model, an altruistic dictator

(the matriarch), who ‘cares’ for the welfare of all the members of her

family, optimally allocates household resources among its members.

However, we must clarify that the matriarch does not dictate because

she is the most altruistic or caring member of the family. She dictates

because she has the power to do so.


The Mosuo tribe is a clear example of how gender roles are in fact

“socially-ascribed”. Women’s biological function of childbearing has

been traditionally used as an argument for the “natural” assignment of

household responsibilities to women. Feminist economists argue,

however, that only childbearing is biologically restricted to women,

while childrearing and household work is socially determined.


In the Mosuo society, men participate in childrearing as uncles and

brothers, but do little else. Surely, the assignment of productive work

to women, including physical labor, has less to do with biological

functions, and more to do with social structure.


{mospagebreak}


How mothers keep the peace


One wonders how it is that the dominated gender, in this case the men,

are not exploited or overworked. It is almost as if the men are being

“compensated” for their disempowerment, and this benevolent treatment

of men is probably what keeps them from overthrowing the matriarch. In

addition, this structure conditions men to depend completely on women

in all aspects of survival. There is simply no incentive for the men to

challenge their existing way of life.


This bears some similarities in the male-dominated households many of

us are more familiar with. When women are less educated, and have less

opportunities to financially support themselves and their children,

they are entirely dependent on their husbands for survival. Unlike the

benevolent treatment of men in the Mosuo tribe, however, these women

work long hours and take on great responsibilities – often without

recognition that what they do is “real work”. Although this breeds

discontent, the lack of alternatives for these women and the threat of

violence, allow this power structure to thrive.


More than just a feminist fantasy, the survival of a culture with a

seemingly impossible setup teaches us an important lesson: that an

alternative social structure can exist. A world where no man rules, no

man makes important decisions, no man inherits property, and no man

works, is not just a myth.


Contrary to fears raised by those who hesitate to empower women,

society need not fall apart when women have control. In fact, the

female-dominated society of Mosuo exists in love and harmony – a stark

contrast to male-dominated societies that exist in violence and hate.

The Mosuo people have successfully averted many social problems. As a

result, their language has no words for war, murder or rape.


The struggle for equality


Although the Mosuo experience is certainly far from the ideal of gender

equality, it shows that there is nothing natural or inevitable about

gender biases. A bias for one or the other is influenced by power

relations and social roles, not biology. If we truly believe that every

individual – regardless of race, ethnicity or gender – is entitled to

the same privileges and benefits development has to offer, we must seek

to transform the very structures that perpetuate and reinforce

inequalities.


The good news is that gender relations have been changing with the

times. Gone were the days when educating girls was believed to be a

waste, since they will only marry and become housewives. Gone were the

days when it was unthinkable for a woman to vote. By recognizing that

social roles can change, given the proper incentives, we have overcome

the first hurdle in the struggle for gender equality.

Comentários


bottom of page